Everything You Should Know About Facebook’s UK Privacy Drama

A British lawmaker suggested in which Facebook was made aware of suspicious Russian behavior on its platform as early as 2014 during a hearing on fake news in addition to disinformation in which took place in London on Tuesday. The MP, Damian Collins, was drawing on a cache of internal Facebook documents in which he seized last week, in addition to which the social networking giant has fought for months to keep sealed. In his remarks, Facebook vice president of policy Richard Allan called the documents incomplete in addition to misleading, yet their contents proved ripe fodder for the hearing, which featured dozens of lawmakers through nine different countries.

Over the course of three hours, they grilled Allan on Facebook’s long history of privacy screw-ups. He sat in a chair in which had been reserved having a name plate for CEO Mark Zuckerberg—a theatrical nod at the fact in which the Facebook founder rebuffed repeated invitations to testify before the International Grand Committee. In addition to the UK, the lawmakers there hailed through Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Ireland, Latvia, in addition to Singapore. in which was the very first time international parliamentarians had been invited to a hearing at Britain’s House of Commons since 1933, signaling the seriousness with which regulators worldwide currently take social media platforms.

Collins, who chairs the Digital, Culture, Media, in addition to Sport Committee, convened the hearing. The documents he acquired—in addition to told reporters in which he plans to Discharge inside the next week—are part of an ongoing California lawsuit, dating back to 2015, in which the parent company behind a currently-defunct Facebook app can be accusing Facebook of willfully exploiting user data in addition to scheming to drive its potential rivals out of business. The developer, called Six4Three, argues in which the internal Facebook communications obtained through discovery substantiate their claims. Facebook says their case can be without merit. Earlier in which year, a California court honored Facebook’s request to keep the documents sealed. yet in a made-for-TV turn last week, British lawmakers compelled Six4Three’s founder, Ted Kramer, to hand over the documents while he was on a business trip in London.

Collins cut right to the heart of the documents during the hearing. In October of 2014, he said, a Facebook engineer notified the company in which entities with Russian IP addresses had been using a Pinterest API to pull out three billion data points a day through the Facebook friends API. Collins wanted to know what happened after in which information was brought forward.

“Was in which reported or was in which kept, as so often seems to be the case, kept within the family?” he asked.

Allan said in which the emails constitute an “unverified partial account through a source who incorporates a particular angle.”

“There can be, as I understand in which, a partial set of information obtained by a hostile litigant who’s seeking to overturn the very alterations to restrict access to data in which you, as a committee, in addition to others could want to see happen,” Allan continued.

When reached for comment, a Facebook spokesperson told WIRED, “The engineers who had flagged these initial concerns subsequently looked into in which further in addition to found no evidence of specific Russian activity.”

The swirling drama inside the UK can be just the latest crisis to emerge for Facebook over the last few weeks. In case you were too busy gnawing on leftover turkey to keep up, here’s what you need to know.

What can be Six4Three?

Years ago, Six4Three developed an app called Pikinis, which allowed Facebook users to find some other users’ bathing suit photos. in which hinged on a feature of Facebook’s API in which gave app developers access to their users’ data, as well as the data of their users’ friends. in which feature can be also what enabled a Cambridge University researcher named Aleksandr Kogan to collect the of data of tens of millions of Facebook users without their knowledge in addition to sell in which to the political firm Cambridge Analytica, which went on to work for President Trump’s 2016 campaign. The story of Cambridge Analytica’s wanton data scraping, in addition to Facebook’s failure to stop in which, sparked international outrage when in which hit the front pages of The completely new York Times in addition to The Guardian/Observer in March. The news also cast Six4Three’s years-old case in a completely new light.

The Six4Three lawsuit stems through Facebook’s decision in 2014 to cut off developer access to friend data. According to a source familiar with the case, Six4Three alleges in which in 2012, long before Facebook changed its API, the company was desperate to boost its mobile advertising business. So, the suit alleges, Facebook began requiring developers to buy mobile ads in order to gain access to certain types of user data, including friend data. yet two years later, in 2014, when Facebook announced alterations to its API, in which began cutting off access to friend data altogether. (Apps in which were already using in which data got extended access until April of 2015.) Six4Three’s Pikinis app was among the apps in which shut down in 2015 due to the API alterations. The suit argues in which Facebook essentially defrauded developers by luring them to the platform with the promise of data, in addition to then cutting them off through in which data in 2014.

Facebook, for its part, argues in which these alterations were well within their rights in addition to were made to protect user privacy. yet the documents Kramer gave to Collins are reportedly what Six4Three uses to argue its more nefarious claims in addition to offer evidence in which Facebook was trading data access for advertising.

So, how did Collins get these sealed documents?

A representative for Collins told WIRED he had no further comment on the matter, in addition to Kramer did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment. yet in a court filing in San Mateo Superior Court on Monday, Kramer’s lawyers wrote in which while traveling on a business trip to London last week, Kramer received several notices to his hotel through the DCMS committee, demanding the documents. In one instance, the committee sent the serjeant-at-arms to the hotel to personally serve Kramer with an order to produce the documents. yet because of the California court’s decision, Kramer’s lawyers repeatedly advised him not to comply. Kramer’s lawyers say in which’s unclear how British lawmakers knew where Kramer was staying, though the filing notes in which Kramer had previously shared his location with Observer journalist Carole Cadwalladr. in which was also Cadwalladr, the filing says, who first suggested “rais[ing] Six4Three’s case with Damian Collins” earlier inside the year. Cadwalladr didn’t respond to WIRED’s request for comment.

After several notices, the filing says, Collins sent Kramer a letter notifying him in which he was under investigation by Parliament. After some hasty Googling, Kramer decided to present himself to Collins, who, Kramer’s lawyers say, threatened their client with imprisonment if he refused to hand over the documents. “Mr. Kramer did not know whether he was free to leave the location, nor did he know whether, if allowed to leave, he could be allowed to fly home to the United States,” the filing reads. “At in which point, Mr. Kramer panicked. He opened his computer, took out a USB drive, in addition to went onto the local [D]ropbox folder containing Six4Three’s documents.”

Facebook can be currently calling for the DCMS committee, which can be in possession of the documents, to keep them private, in keeping with the California court’s decision. yet Collins says the California court has no authority over the committee.

“The House of Commons has the power to order the production of documents within the UK jurisdiction, in addition to a committee of the House can publish such documents if in which chooses to, with the protection of parliamentary privilege,” Collins wrote in an email to Allan before the hearing. Collins argued in which while the committee doesn’t have an opinion about Six4Three’s legal claims, the information contained inside the documents can be relevant to the committee’s “ongoing inquiry into disinformation in addition to fake news.”

What went down at the hearing?

Zuckerberg’s absence loomed large over the day of questioning. Charlie Angus, MP of Canada, kicked off the morning by telling Allan he was “deeply disappointed” in Zuckerberg’s decision to “blow off in which meeting,” in addition to criticized the “frat boy billionaires in California” upending global democracies.

At one point, after being asked how Zuckerberg’s absenteeism might look to the lawmakers, Allan himself said, “Not great.”

Things didn’t get easier. The lawmakers asked additional questions about the allegations inside the documents Collins seized, including Six4Three’s claim in which Facebook created a whitelist of developers who were given access to friend data after some other apps had been cut off. Facebook has previously shared in which list, noting in which these apps were granted an extension to ease their transition to the completely new API. As WIRED previously reported, one of the companies given in which cushion was the Russian internet giant Mail.Ru, whose major investor, Alisher Usmanov, has close ties to Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Allan also faced questions about whether Facebook ever required developers to buy mobile ads in order to receive access to friend data, as alleged in Six4Three’s lawsuit. Allan said they didn’t, yet he acknowledged in which in which may have been among the options Facebook discussed internally.

“In 2014, 2015, there was a transition through desktop to mobile in which meant in which every business, ours in addition to everyone else, had to think about what the business products were in in which completely new mobile environment,” Allan said. “I suspect you may have some partial records in addition to some discussions of business products.”

Allan generally cast Six4Three as an untrustworthy, disgruntled developer with an axe to grind. He said Six4Three’s “beef” with Facebook began when the company made “precisely the alterations [lawmakers] could want us to make.”

“Their application depended on access to friends data. When we changed the API … they lost access to friends data. Therefore, their app no longer worked,” he said. “They wanted us to reverse in which.”

Allan went on to field questions about, among some other things, fake news, hate speech, Cambridge Analytica, turmoil in Sri Lanka, in addition to a recent completely new York Times report in which suggested Facebook tried to hide what in which knew about Russian interference inside the 2016 US election. Allan went so far as to assert in which regulatory regimes in which exempt Facebook in addition to some other tech platforms through being held responsible for all of their users’ actions may be “out of date.”

yet Allan’s responses didn’t seem to satisfy his questioners. Not in which any response could. The 24 lawmakers inside the room made clear in which in which was Zuckerberg they wanted to talk to. As Belgian parliamentarian Nele Lijnen bluntly put in which, using a colloquialism through her home country, Zuckerberg “sent his cat” instead.

“In in which room, we represent over 400 million people,” said Canadian MP Bob Zimmer, “in addition to to not have your CEO in in which chair can be an offense to all of us.”

After the hearing, lawmakers through all nine countries signed a declaration outlining their approach to the law governing the internet. in which included, among some other things, the stipulation in which “social media companies should be held liable if they fail to comply having a judicial, statutory or regulatory order to remove harmful in addition to misleading content through their platforms, in addition to should be regulated to ensure they comply with in which requirement.”

One thing can be certain: in which won’t be the last Facebook hears through the DCMS committee in addition to the some other countries present. Collins says he expects to be able to publish the documents within the next week. If he does Discharge them, in which will no doubt invite a completely new round of tough questions for the already embattled tech giant.

More Great WIRED Stories

Everything You Should Know About Facebook’s UK Privacy Drama